2020 Election Irregularities: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
General <br> | General <br> | ||
Zuckbucks <br> | * Zuckbucks <br> | ||
Chain of Custody <br> | * Chain of Custody <br> | ||
Signature Verification <br> | * Signature Verification <br> | ||
Observers while counting ballots <br> | * Observers while counting ballots <br> | ||
Dominion voting machines <br> | * Dominion voting machines <br> | ||
* Distribution of applications for mail-in ballots | |||
Wisconsin<br> | Wisconsin<br> | ||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_United_States_presidential_election_from_Wisconsin | [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_United_States_presidential_election_from_Wisconsin Wisconsin Full Table] | ||
Pennsylvania | Pennsylvania<br> | ||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_United_States_presidential_election_from_Pennsylvania] | [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_United_States_presidential_election_from_Pennsylvania Table] | ||
Michigan | Michigan<br> | ||
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_United_States_presidential_election_from_Michigan] | [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-election_lawsuits_related_to_the_2020_United_States_presidential_election_from_Michigan Table] | ||
Georgia | Georgia<br> | ||
The judge's decision found that the Dominion election machines used by the government of Georgia could be manipulated to impact the election. | The judge's decision found that the Dominion election machines used by the government of Georgia could be manipulated to impact the election. | ||
The Judge, however, also said it was too close to the presidential election to do anything to stop the use of the machines. Thus, the election was conducted using voting machines known to have been corrupted so as to allow manipulations.. <br> | The Judge, however, also said it was too close to the presidential election to do anything to stop the use of the machines. Thus, the election was conducted using voting machines known to have been corrupted so as to allow manipulations.. <br> | ||
Arizona<br> | |||
https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/right-wing-group-files-new-arizona-election-lawsuit-after-withdrawing-from-maricopa-county/<br> | https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/right-wing-group-files-new-arizona-election-lawsuit-after-withdrawing-from-maricopa-county/<br> | ||
Nevada<br> | |||
Nevada | |||
Michigan | Michigan<br> | ||
Revision as of 00:45, 2 April 2024
General
- Zuckbucks
- Chain of Custody
- Signature Verification
- Observers while counting ballots
- Dominion voting machines
- Distribution of applications for mail-in ballots
Wisconsin
Wisconsin Full Table
Pennsylvania
Table
Michigan
Table
Georgia
The judge's decision found that the Dominion election machines used by the government of Georgia could be manipulated to impact the election.
The Judge, however, also said it was too close to the presidential election to do anything to stop the use of the machines. Thus, the election was conducted using voting machines known to have been corrupted so as to allow manipulations..
Nevada
Michigan