Mar-a-Lago Documents (Jack Smith): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
LINK: [https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/commentary/was-it-legal-appoint-jack-smith-the-first-place was-it-legal-appoint-jack-smith-the-first-place]<br> | LINK: [https://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/commentary/was-it-legal-appoint-jack-smith-the-first-place was-it-legal-appoint-jack-smith-the-first-place]<br> | ||
==Related | ==Related Categoryys== | ||
[[Biden Retained Records]] | [[Biden Retained Records]] | ||
Revision as of 23:56, 1 June 2024
Charges
LINK: 6 Ways Jack Smith’s Latest Indictment Is Legally Flawed And Politically Shady
https://thefederalist.com/2024/03/12/hur-highlights-dojs-totalitarian-double-standards-on-handling-classified-documents/
Mar-a-Lago Raid
LINK: evelation-secret-obama-era-program-casts-doubt-stated-reason-trump-mar-a-lago-raid
LINK: did-federal-agencies-plant-classified-documents-to-frame-trump
Need for raid?
Jack Smith, Special Counsel
LINK: was-it-legal-appoint-jack-smith-the-first-place